Feminism

How Has the Feminist Movement Impacted Members of Our Society? When you read that question, was the FIRST thing in your mind “Feminist Baby”? The children’s book written by Loryn Brantz shows a little girl who is not afraid of doing her own thing. If that somehow wasn’t your first thought then you will relate to the majority of my class who was happily surprised when our launch activity included us looking through this book and thinking about why it was created. After reading the very entertaining book we each created mind maps showing everything we thought of when we heard the word feminist. Here is mine:

I thought that I was fairly educated in this area until I actually had to create my mind map. As you can see my mind map was fairly basic, but while that’s unfortunate, it was still fine seeing as though it was only day one of the project.

 After this launch activity we learned that our final product was going to be a research paper/essay that included an interview. When I heard this I…….was not excited. I was conflicted because I knew it was an important topic but I also knew that I dislike interviewing people, writing isn’t my strong suit, and that it was going to take a lot of work.

To start the project off, our investigation stage was all about building our knowledge on the four waves of the feminist movements. We would spend our classes listening and reading about the feminist movement then writing responses to various questions. I have never been a fan of reading in class because I find that I never finish the article by the time we talked about it as a class.  I was able to give well written out answers but many times I had to ask for an extension in order to do so. 

The next part of this project I am actually really proud of myself for. Over the course of the whole project we read Becoming by Michelle Obama which is a great book but its also our fourth and longest novel study of the year. Normally in high school we do one or two novel studies in a year, so I was not overjoyed, initially, to learn that we would have to read the 24 chapter book. This is the part where I am proud of myself because I actually used my systems and did really well. I found an audiobook and listened to my book while having my screen split between my notes and my online book copy so I could highlight, get quotes, make notes, all while following along. Then for the book notes I always had more than one question and I backed them up with in text examples. For the Socratic seminars I would always offer to start off the conversations and I continued to contribute multiple times and would ask questions and build off the ongoing conversation. I normally hate talking in class but I also wanted to show my ideas and how I did in fact read the book and that I did understand what was going on. 

This brings us to the hardest part of the project, the final product. To start we needed to decide what we wanted to research and write about. Knowing I had to interview someone I decided that I would ask and see who I could talk to before deciding what I wanted to directly focus on. When asking around to my relatives and friends I still couldn’t decide on what I would be interested in learning more about. It wasn’t until I read about Christian involvement in the second – third wave that I realized what I wanted to do: can someone be a Christian and a feminist? With my topic I now had to find someone to interview and write my thesis. Finding someone to interview turned out to be fairly easy, I had three plausible options that in the end I decided to go with only one so that my essay wasn’t too busy. I interviewed Ms. Vance who currently holds a Masters of Leadership and Development and is Director of Organizational Development for Norquest College in Edmonton, Alberta; however, she also worked as a pastor for many years. Even now, outside of that role, she serves on national and western Canadian boards for interdenominational organizations. In other words, she knew what she was talking about both in experience and in an academic sense. My interview with her went smoothly and with my questions I was able to get even more information than I needed. The thesis was next. I did probably 20 different drafts of my thesis before writing my introduction, then I wrote ten more after showing my introduction to my friends and teacher. Their feedback was that my thesis was too chunky and no matter how many times I reworded it I couldn’t change that enough. In the end I decided to switch the order of my body paragraphs around so the thesis flowed better. 

With my introduction and thesis done it was time for the research and writing part of the essay. Even though I’ve always struggled with writing this part didn’t go to bad because I made detailed notes, asked for lots of feedback, and got help when I needed it. In the end my first draft was finished on time and I was able to get feedback from multiple different classmates. My favourite part of this process was learning about feminism in Christianity and how words are often mistranslated. For example, in some translations a word that means “everyone” is translated into “men” or another translates the same Hebrew word into “elder”, when in reference to men, and “servant” when in reference to women. This area of study has always been really intriguing to me and I’m glad I got to look into it. One particular line of my essay that I am proud of is “By seeing this inter-connectivity, there is proof that it is not only possible to be a Christian and a feminist but that they can support one another’s desire to bring societal change.” 

In the end, I am happy with the essay I handed in and enjoyed the project more than I thought. If I had to do this project again I think I would’ve liked to do more research on Christians in feminist movements as well as how different feminism movements has affected the church. 

Pivottt!!!! Pivotttttt!!!!! Timbit?

Hello world, for the past five months I have felt like Ross in “Friends” when he was trying to move a couch up a set of stairs while yelling “PIVOT” over and over again. The phrase my teachers always say was running through my mind too: “Flexibility is a tortoise🐢 trait” though most of the time flexibility and pivoting in this project felt like how Sisyphus must feel pushing that rock🪨 up a hill: hard, never ending, and the feeling that it might all come crashing down and be for nothing at any second. 

Welcome to my 👻 HORROR 😱project blog post filled terrifying events like when your group members decide to change the storyline after you had already spent two days making one, or when your people don’t know who the main character is TWO MONTHS into the film production, or when people decide that they can learn their lines five minutes before we need them on camera, or when your director leaves for a month and literally has no internet to do her job……fun times 💀. Anyway I guess it is time to give you context and show you what this project really was about, but before I do that I just want to warn you that this blog post is longer then normal because this project was 4 months long. 

(PLP 12 casually taking four months on a project be like ⬆️)

Now you might be wondering “hey, isn’t this a humanities class? Why are they learning about horror? ” well, that is what I used to think too (not that I wanted to say it out loud in case they changed their minds…..). The reason we were studying horror is perfectly outlined in the driving question: “Why is horror such an effective way to reflect and comment on our society?” The horror genre gives people the ability to see and process our biggest fears in a controlled setting. It also enables us to see how fears have evolved over the decades.  For example, during the height of the Cold War, lots of horror movies showed an evil imposter hiding among people as the villain. Today, we have lots of zombie 🧟‍♂️ plague movies, as well of lots of movies about being in total isolation which we can connect directly to COVID-19.

 

 

This brings us to investigation one which was all about Frankenstein!!!! The first fact you need to know is that Frankenstein is the name of the scientist not the “monster” and the second fact is that Mary Shelley’s book Frankenstein is nothing like the movies. Another interesting thing to note is that when Mary Shelley’s first edition of her book came out, (when she was only 20) it did not have her name on it. It wasn’t until the second edition of her book three years later that she was identified as the author. This is because it was the early 1800s and she couldn’t put her name on it the first time because she was a women. This book actually became a cornerstone of the gothic genre that people still read centuries later.  It’s the  themes of isolation, guilt, grief, fear and her manipulation of nature that come together to create this awesome novel Frankenstein that follows the life of Victor Frankenstein and how he comes to create his “monster”. 

Throughout reading this novel, I was surprised how different it was from today’s horror and gothic genres, because it wasn’t gory, fast paced or about a man in a mask with a knife. That’s because the ideas and themes I said above were scary in their own way especially for the time period it was created in. After a number of chapters we would take our notes, themes, and connections and discuss them in small groups. I found that I was much more comfortable and confident in these smaller group discussions and that I was able to effectively communicate my understanding. My notes themselves showed a deep and meaningful understanding of the novel and of the role fear played in the storytelling aspects. You can find my notes here if you want to learn more about Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. 

The next investigation was quite different from our normal investigations in humanities as it included us watching horror movies. We did this to better understand how fear can be used in different situations and they gave us ideas for how we can create our final product.

The first movie we watched was the original John carpenter Halloween movie made in 1978. This movie demonstrated how long pauses cause a mix of fear and suspense and how we don’t need blood or a large budget to make a good movie. 

Next was 28 Days Later, which is a well known zombie movie released in 2003. This movie I enjoyed a lot more because it used more action and jump scares to incite fear while still having long suspenseful pauses. I also really liked how the director incorporated a feeling of isolation through amazing shots and views of empty streets which would cause anyone to feel uneasy. Once you add in the fact its a zombie movie… it definitely induced fear in the audience. 

Lastly we watched Get Out, which was released in 2017 and unlike the others used more psychological horror to create fear. This one was very well made and the twist at the end was crazy. My favourite part was how much foreshadowing and symbolism there was down to the cereal and milk being separated in one scene. 

All of these movies showed different fears in very different ways. After watching all of these films, we thought about the specific techniques used and make connections to other projects. I think my notes showed very insightful thoughts and connections which you can find here: (Halloween, 28 Days Later, Get out). 

 

These steps led to the last investigation/ the final product/ the reason for a lot of stress, work, problem solving and pride!!!  Our assignment was to create a 15-25 minute horror movie. This was by far the longest PLP project we have done (on and off September → January) with a lot of hard work, responsibility and pivoting. BUT it is  — by far — my favourite (kinda, this does not include any field school projects because those automatically are just too good to count).

First we needed to be put in two groups and to do that we needed to hand in a pitch form saying what role we wanted in the creation of the movie. When I first looked at the choices for film jobs I had no idea what to pick as I don’t like writing enough to want to write the script (thanks dyslexia), I have no idea how to use editing software and my acting could use…work. That’s until I told someone (my classmate Sabrina or Ava I believe) that I am better at organizing people, and I prefer to do more than one thing and they suggested I pitch for producer (if only I knew what I was getting into).

After being put into our groups we needed to decide on what type of horror we were going to to do and what our rough story outline was. This took many days with lots of debate and new ideas, and at many times it seemed like we restarted the discussion daily. One day I was trying to think of ways to get people to collaborate more so I brought Tim bits which oddly enough was the day we decided on psychological/killer and we came up with our rough story (whether it worked or it was a coincidence I don’t know).  From there we started the script where our Max R , our scriptwriter, worked with Ava, our director, and Sabrina, our production designer to create many drafts of our movie SHATTERED. This is one part of the project where I was able to help a lot as a producer. I worked deadlines around different people’s schedules and I made sure everyone read the script and gave feedback. Along with making sure others gave feedback, I gave lots of feedback on every draft and put the drafts in our groups craft link to keep everything organised. Unfortunately, even after many drafts of the script we realised that our ending did not make sense and against many people’s protests I decided we needed to change it. I got the director,  the scriptwriters, and one of our editors together (to get different perspectives) and we discussed how to fix our problem. After several rounds of discussion we had a plan and we changed the storyline. Here is our final story idea: “Months after the events of a grad camping trip gone horribly wrong, the surviving girl is deeply affected by the trauma of this event and is trying to move on, but her nightmare is far from over when she starts seeing the killer everywhere she goes.” 

The main real world connection that we were trying to show through our film was that trauma is long lasting and greatly impacts the lives of those who have experienced it. We should all make an effort to have more compassion and patience, and to not dismiss the struggles of those suffering from trauma. 

Our next big struggle was the filming. If I am being honest, just thinking about it gives me a headache because we had a lot of problems we had to pivot around. (See couch photo). The first hard part is that we took a break and started a whole other project in this class because we couldn’t go to Loon Lake (the retreat where we were going as a class to film) until end of November. This was hard because while we were “taking a break” we still had lots of work to do so it left like doing two projects at once. The props, lines, equipment, people all had to be organized before we went. I remember carefully making my schedule and planning who would bring what so it was there on time and two days before we left it seemed like it would all be fine. Then it wasn’t. Our first problem is that we changed our camera we were using one day, at the last minute but I forgot to make sure the person bringing it would be there on time. Unfortunately by the time I realised my error, we didn’t have what we needed and we had already lost filming time, so I quickly decided to go back to our original plan so we didn’t lose more time even though it would decrease the quality of those scenes. The next problem involved teammates not showing up when they said they would which made keeping to a schedule very challenging. We also found that it took a lot longer to film than we originally thought, so I moved some things around. Before we left for Loon Lake, we also discovered that our group member’s drone wouldn’t work for what we wanted it too so we had to pivot and use the other group’s drone. Unfortunately, that one ended up breaking (I think it ran into a tree….) and so I had to work with the cinematographers to find a new plan. These situations really tested my leadership and organization skills. Our main problems were around group members not being prepared, which in Grade 12 is quite frustrating, and also because of Ava and I underestimating how long it would take to film a scene. So after the first day I read through our schedule and reorganized it to put everything we absolutely needed filmed at Loon Lake on the day two and pushed everything else to if we had time on day three. This worked pretty well and even with the changes in plans and problems with filming we got everything we needed and most of what we wanted. 

My favourite part of filming at Loon Lake was our “school sanctioned rager” that we created for one of our scenes. This involved speakers, lights, and a red plastic cup, all to create the illusion of a party where our main character spots the killer. While the filming for this went well it was also honestly just really fun and definitely a highlight. 

While Loon Lake was very productive, we still had almost a full act to film (of our three) and that required a lot of organization. About a week and a half in advance I informed my group that we would be filming on the Tuesday we had off from school. I then created a schedule, trying to give most people as much time to sleep in as possible without harming the movie. This meant that we filmed our scenes with less people first then didn’t film much until that evening. Our first problem was that we needed a set of parents for our final act and we had forgot until a few days before that we hadn’t found any yet. This meant I had to desperately ask everyone in my group if their parents were available. Unfortunately in the end we only had my Dad and then we dressed Sabrina up to look old. This filming went really well too (shout out to Ava and Sylas for the awesome mirror scenes) and we ended up getting all the shots we needed. 

This brings us to the editing. Our first draft of our movie was hard to watch and made me worried, especially since my director was about to leave for a month long trip. But this fear didn’t last long because once we were back at school the editors were able to fully commit  to making the film amazing. While the deadline was tough to meet, I was proud of how (once I learned about the due date) I changed people’s roles around making us have three -ish editors and I checked in with each of them daily, giving feedback and trying to help out where I could. I found the editing portion of this film making quite tough  because I HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO EDIT WELL. I instead found myself only able to help, give advice and just trust that the editors would be able to complete the movie well and on time. After seeing many, many, MANY drafts of each act we got Declan started on the music which made a huge difference to the overall feel of the film. 

While there is a lot more I can say about this project, I feel like this is already the longest blog I’ve written in years (if not ever). So I just wanted to wrap it up and say that this project was hard and that it pushed me outside of my comfort zone, made me have to learn how to deal with different people and added a lot of stress, but it also was so cool to work on this film every step of the way and it feels amazing to have a completed film that I’m actually proud I have created. Please make sure you watch the film below because —while there are things that could still be improved—it still shows how much hard work and effort was put into it.  

Cat and Maus

This project was based around the question “How can multi-modal communication enhance our ability to humanize and understand complex issues?” While I’ve always wanted to know more about the Holocaust (since all I had known before this project is what’s in the Disney plus show called A Small Light), I’ve always been cautious about the topic. The first thing Ms. Madsen said to us about this project is that we had to watch what we were saying because it is such a horrific and serious topic that still greatly affects us our world today. 

For this project we learned about the Holocaust and the events leading up to it through reading articles, lectures, video testimonies, a symposium and a visit by a granddaughter of a survivor. Each one of these sources added more and more horrible information that I couldn’t imagine. We started with learning about the rise of the Nazis, and then the growth of antisemitism ending with the Holocaust itself. For the first investigation, I wrote a paragraph talking about which type of format resonated most with me and why. 

This assignment got to me more than I would’ve thought. When I’m in class listening to every horrible thing about this time in history I would try to focus on just writing things down, or on the content, and not the person side of it, but for this assignment all of it was the personal and thinking side. This assignment was meant to demonstrate my analyzing skills and I think I really did that. I not only shared what I learned from the activity that most resonated with me but I believed I showed in depth thought into why. I chose the activity about the granddaughter of a survivor because she made it seem more real and not just statistics. Every person she mentioned was a cousin or uncle or dad of her grandmother and all I could think about was my own family. If you want to see what my paragraph was listen to the voice memo below (I chose to do a voice memo because it seemed more personal to me).

Investigation two was reading Maus which is a graphic novel by Art Spiegelman and the only graphic novel to ever win a Pulitzer Prize. This book is about the author learning and writing about his father’s experience during the Holocaust. Reading this book was crazy because  every few pages there was a way his father could’ve been caught or died. His father was also treated terribly and went through so much pain and loss that you could see still the experiences affecting him when the book changed between past and present. With this book we were instructed to do a literacy critique in an essay format. While we were supposed to choose to write on the psychology aspect of the trauma depicted in the book, or on a comparison of two characters or on the literary elements, I chose to combine the first two because to me they seemed very intertwined. I wanted to show how the trauma Vladek experienced affected how he interacted with everyone around him and how those people then reacted. I’m actually very proud of my essay which isn’t always true for past essays. I had so much to write (maybe too much …… 7 pages…..) and had lots of examples of everything because unlike reading novels, I could remember it because I had pictures to go with the words. I have very strong narrative memory skills. I liked my writing and my friends thought it was good so I decided to see what Ms Madsen thought. Earlier this week I got the essay back with few parts needing revision so I changed those but most parts earned an ✅.  Overall I thought my essay showed in depth thinking and is an essay I’m actually proud I wrote. 

The final product was “With a partner, choose an upstander (historical or current), research who they are and how they stood up against intolerance, and create a multimodal exhibit to contribute to our class showcase celebrating difference making!” Which was meant to be showed at the spring exhibition. If your curious what an Upstanders is here are a few definitions my teacher gave us:

My partner for this project was Fraser and together we came up with awesome plan to research the incredible Irena Sendler who saved 2500 Jewish children from the Warsaw ghetto and then make an interactive timeline in milk bottles. At the same time in BCFP I had started to research the mistreatment of Indigeous people in healthcare. While I was trying to manage the two projects the plans for the exhibition changed. Ultimately, the new choices led to Fraser and I merging our “Upstander” project and our BCFP project although there was plenty of confusion. Personally, I  wanted to do both from the beginning so was glad when they got combined. I am very proud of how I acted when they got combined too, as most people got very stressed and didn’t know where to start but I just got a white board and a pen and started planning. In the end our exhibition exhibit was educational and engaging. Fraser and I had multiple interactive parts including our original timeline idea, effective visuals including orange origami roses to make into a heart, and a call to action which was a physical card the visitors could bring home. Everything was presented well from the crisp edges of the paper, and the interesting layout.  I was super passionate about both topics (Irena Sendler’s life and the terrible mistreatment of Indigenous people in the healthcare system) and really enjoyed telling everyone one about it. While all of those things alone were great I was really impressed with how I explained the project to everyone who walked by. I really enjoyed explaining and showing everything I knew from when Irena got in a fight at school to when she was almost executed and found myself realizing how in the younger grades I wouldn’t have been able to do that so confidently.

This project was filled with horrible history that I’m glad is being taught, because it is so important to where we are today with antisemitism rising. Please check out the links and read the images below to learn about Irena Sendler and her incredible her life and as check out my BCFP post connected to this as well. 

Radiation, Bombs, and FEAR

Who knew you could see and do so much stuff in ten days! This was the project that incorporated my field study trip in grade 11. As you can probably guess from the title the project was about fear, more specifically answering the question “How has fear been used as a political, defensive, and cultural tool to shape our society?” 

 

One of the first things we did to launch 🚀 this project was read Hiroshima by John Hersey. This book follows the lives of 6 different survivors of Hiroshima, before, during, and after the atomic bomb was dropped. We did in class discussions, wrote theme analyses, and just considered the different views on the decision to drop the bomb. I found reading this book very interesting because I’ve never known much about Hiroshima and Nagasaki even though they were such an important part of our history and I’m glad I got to understand more of what happened. I also learned more about how an author can use different ways of story telling to show us a theme or message. Most information after the war about Hiroshima was about the statistics, where as this book showed people the influence the bomb had on individuals.

Then we BUILT A SECOND BRAIN! (Technically we just started building a second brain but still.) Have you every heard of a Zettelkasten??? Well before this project I hadn’t heard about it either; its based on the idea that our brain can’t hold all the information and thoughts you have in a day so you write them down in different formats and use your brain more to make connections between everything you write down. Out of the three types of notes (fleeting, literature, and permanent) I found that I normally do fleeting, I find the second one hard and I found the permanent most useful. I am not going to lie but for a while there when we were learning this in class I was thinking “this is never going to be useful to me,” “whyyyyyyyyyyy” and “what the heck is going on,” but guess what? I used the links for permanent notes in my writing on the project I’m working on now. Ms. Madsen told us to write a paragraph on why stories are a good way to learn and I was like “hey I wrote a permanent note about this” so then I linked it and used the previous things I had link to as examples for this piece of writing!!! It actually works!!!!!!! I’m trying to still keep the system in place but I am finding myself falling behind on it so I might need to change how I do parts of it to find something that works better for me. Overall I liked how I could show the connections between topics instead of just having them in my head for a day then forgetting them. 

Using our Zettelkasten system to record information and our thoughts, we watched different films about atomic warfare, and just the Cold War in general. During this time we also read a book called Fallout by Todd Strasser which I found really engaging. It focused more on the impacts the Cold War had on individuals and it was my inspiration to my own question for the project. Unlike most PLP projects we got to choose not only what our final product would be but we also got to create our own inquiry question to answer. Being interested on individual people’s decisions during the Cold War I decided on the question “How did fear influence people’s and society’s decisions about personal safety?”

Then our TRIP. I loved this trip, it was even better then last years (which was also amazing) and last year’s was to Disney World so you know the bar was high. We flew into Tucson Arizona, then went to a missile silo (where I gotta be one of the people to turn the key), copper mine, a long hike, museum/zoo, air and space museum (I absolutely loved this part, especially talking to the people there), an all you can eat buffet, all you can eat buffet and a wild West show. Then on our way to Sedona we went to the biosphere 2, visited the Casa grande ruins, and heard an organ player at a pizza restaurant. Then still making our way up Arizona we went on a really cool hike with beautiful views (this was my favourite hike), another really cool hike, a church in the mountains, and saw an IMAX video that had a cougar attack in it! The next day we woke up at 4 o’clock and saw the sunrise on the south end of the Grand Canyon (if you ever go see the sunrise there WEAR PANTS it is cold), then we hiked, partly down into the canyon, which was beautiful, we got to explore, we drove up and stopped at this town on Route 66 which had lots of cool shops, and ended the day at a delicious steakhouse. The next few days included museums, the Hoover dam, the Neon museum,  Fremont Street, National Atomic Testing Museum, Las Vegas crazy casinos, talking to AI robots, seeing the sphere show, another all you can eat buffet and undercover mansion, more malls, three hours in a place called Omega mart and so so much more. It was amazing to visit these places first hand and especially to talk to the volunteers at the Air and Space museum because they had actually been kids during the Cold War. 

When we got back from our (amazing) trip we were in a bit of a rush to finish our final product. I am really proud of what I created for my question but it took a long time and I should’ve done a less time consuming style of animation. For this project we got to pitch whatever final product we thought could show our answer to our inquiry question and I wanted to do something I wouldn’t normally get to do for a project. Since my question was about peoples’ decisions being influenced by fear I wanted to show some of those possible decisions by making an interactive story!!! The hardest part for me (other than the drawings which took a really really long time. P.S. do not look at any of the peoples hands in the illustrations… I gave up on trying to draw hands years ago), was showing that it was fear that made people make these decisions. From my research, I could see that it wasn’t just “oh I feel like making kids hide under desks today,” but that people were scared and had to make hard decisions with different impacts. For my animation I designed it to seem like you were a mother in 1960 in Tucson, Arizona where you had to make all these decisions based off different information that I gathered on my trip and in my search. Throughout the animation, with almost every decision there was an option to “give up and move on with my life,” which I included because fear can also drive you to push away the fear, or you may also realize that you just did not believe in it and I thought that was an important perspective that I needed to add. Overall, I’m especially proud of how I included evidence in so many different forms: I had voice interviews, videos, photos, pamphlets and drawings. Creating this final product was very fun (even the drawings…sorta) but mostly I enjoyed it because I actually am very proud of what I made and felt I showed a lot of my learning in a very creative way. If you click here you can see and go through my final product (unfortunately you have to have an app called keynote in order to see the animations and videos) 

Fear has influenced the world in so many ways, and if you want to see other ways from during the Cold War I suggest you check out Teva’s about secrets, or Fraser’s about Canada today or Nolan about technology, or Ava’s about the red scare and McCarthyism or Sabrina’s about politics or any of the other PLP 11s who all showed different sides and ideas.  I never knew much about the Cold War but I definitely never realized just how big an impact it had on our society. It was a war not fought by soldiers or guns, but with fear. This isn’t the only example of fear shaping our society but it does help show how our world is so connected and defined by fear.

The Manhattan Project Project

How did the development of the atomic bomb change the world?

All of  my information regarding the Manhattan Project before this unit came from the TRAILER of the Oppenheimer movie. I knew the US built a different type of bomb and that it had devastating effects that ended WWII. I didn’t even know enough to have an opinion on the driving question.

We started the project with lectures about the people, science, and effect of the atomic bomb. We then wrote a piece on any event or person that we wanted talk about and argue why it was historically significant. My choice was to write about Pearl Harbour which led me to research and gave me a chance to revisit the idea of historical significance which we would be using throughout this project. You can see my argument for why Pearl Harbour is historically significant here.

Next, instead of keystones or milestones like most humanities projects, we dived into the creation of the final product by being put into groups of 6. Our goal over the next few weeks was to research, write, design, and publish an interactive book on the historical significance of the Manhattan Project. Our group took a loooong time to brainstorm ideas for our book but in the end we came up with an original and creative idea for our book that no other group did. Instead of writing the book from an outside point of view, we wrote the book from Oppenheimer’s perspective, and turned it into his journal.

 

For part of this project, two group members went on a field school to New Mexico, and visited the Trinity site and a museum which is where they interviewed people and took photos for our book. Back at Seycove, the rest of us split up the book into sections. As the project manager, I helped split up the tasks and research topics to start the process of creating out book. I personally set goals for each class and made sure everyone knew what their job was when they left class each day. I was in charge of finding and writing the information for the “classified file” and the opening writing about Oppenheimer becoming director of Los Alamos.

 

One of the requirements of our book was making sure each team member was in a video so my group came up with the idea to do a reenactment of Vice President Truman becoming President and then finding out about the Manhattan Project. This emphasized how much of a secret the building of the atomic bomb was even at high levels of government.

Overall my group worked really well together. Everybody did their part and helped to come up with ideas when our book got off track or when our thesis needed to be revised. I really liked collaborating in this project and I think it would have been difficult to do on my own. We could build our ideas off of each other and research and develop the part of the book we were interested in doing. I also liked how we each had roles as it made things go smoother. We knew who would edit the videos, for example, and who to ask for help when designing the layout of our pages. We could rely on each other to do our part while still being able to ask for help and get a response when we needed one.

Much of this project was about communication and research skills. As a group we found it really challenging to find sources that talked about Oppenheimer’s thoughts, which caused difficulty considering it was supposed to be from his perspective. This led to deeper research and creativity. I really love how we had different ways to show our information. We had the classified file at the beginning, newspaper to show the historical significance the end, as well as interviews, a video, and photos. To make our book to feel more like a journal we called the chapters “entries,” crossed out words, and coffee stains on the pages.

Now at the end of the project, I realize how much more to the Manhattan project there is than I thought. It was interesting to learn “little’ details like the government actually built a full town so the scientists could bring their families. It was also interesting to learn more about why the decision to build, and drop the bomb is controversial. Below you can see my group’s final product. Make sure you check out the top-notch reenactment video as well as read why this event is so historically significant.

 

F.A.I.L (Faith’s Advice In Learning)

How can we use the power of written text to inspire the new PLP 8 learners? That was the driving question for the first PLP 11 project. This project was a lot more English based then many humanities projects, which I found challenging. Writing and grammar have never been my strong suit so when we started a project called “Mightier than the sword” I was a bit worried. 

To start off the project we did writing workshops and learned about the writing process. This included learning new ways to brainstorm and finding different techniques that worked better for us. If you click here you can see my writing journal where I reflected on this experience. 

In my writing journal you will also find my academic writing which was the next part of this project. For the academic writing we had to think about the audience and tone  so you can see my process in the rhetorical analysis in the writing journal. I found the rhetorical analysis especially hard in the writing process because its a different type of purposeful writing than I usually do. Normally I write down some ideas and some evidence and then just start writing; for a rhetorical analysis, I had to think about what contexts and audiences affect my writing. The requirements for the academic where to write about why PLP is a good choice for students focusing on whatever aspects we wanted. I decided to write mine on hand on learning because I know this is a type of learning I have found very useful in PLP. I have done a bit of writing in the last few years but this one was much harder then most of what I had done before. This writing was serious and needed research and sources and quotes which all took a lot of time. I wrote many drafts (that you can see in my writing journal above) and got lots of feedback I used for my final draft. 

This brings us to the final product which was creating a piece of writing for the PLP Grade 8s. Now as grade 11 student I don’t interact with the grade 8s on a normal basis so figuring out what they would want to get advice on was challenging. We started off with lots of brainstorming and then came up with questions to ask them during a morning snack/discussion time one morning. I participated in the early group for the discussions and it went really well. I was able to get good ideas of who the Grade 8 are and what they are concerned about for high school. Using that information I decided to write my advice on F.A.I.L which in PLP means First Attempt In Learning. I am very proud of the name I decided to call my writing F.A.I.L (Faith’s Advice In Learning ).  For this writing I liked how I added in my own experiences as well as my brother’s as I felt that it added a more personal touch that gave the students first hand advice. I found the type of writing for this much more casual and fun compared to the academic writing so I found it easier to write. 

I unfortunately wasn’t able to get any feedback from the Grade 8 on my writing but I am proud of what I wrote which is my goal this year to be proud of what I hand in. If you click here you can see my final writing I hope it’s helpful to you PLP 8 out there :). 

 

Ology of Apology

 

 

Driving question: How can we keep apologies for past wrongs alive so they are remembered and not repeated today? 

I found this question very complicated as it is a big part of our world. Answering this through our project took a lot of time, research, and collaboration. We started by watching a documentary covering Japanese internment, Chinese head tax, and the Komagata Maru. Even though it only scratched the surface of each event, I realized that Canada has a lot to apologize for in its history. We were then all assigned one of these event to research thoroughly and find primary sources that tell the story. 

For keystone one, we needed 8 primary sources that I could then analyze and use to tell my story. The first step of finding the primary sources was harder than I had originally thought. I not only had to find first hand accounts but also needed the right and readable ones to clearly tell the story from different views. Even though I ended up getting a sophisticated understanding mark for keystone one, I found the actual process harder than just not being able to find the right sources. When I eventually found the sources I needed, I had a very difficult time analyzing and understanding the primary sources. A lot of the language they used was confusing and hard to read because of age. I spent a lot of time doing the writing for each source and reflecting on that reality, I should have used my IEP to ask for less sources so I could’ve had time for creativity on other parts of the slides. Even with that situation, I am very proud of my work and that is shows my sophisticated understanding of the Komagata Maru.

Keystone 2 was more simple we already had all the information that we needed. Our assignment was to write our own ethical judgment with evidence about our event then record it. I found understanding what an ethical judgment is the most difficult part of this keystone.

“Ethical judgments are attempts to assess the appropriateness of past actions and our current responses to them, remaining mindful of present values and sensibilities and considering fully the norms of the time.”

After that I just wrote a paragraph and did an audio recording of my ethical judgment.

Keystone 3 was the visual representation of the project which was in the form of a monument. I was put in a group with my friends, Ava and Ariane, and together we came up with the idea of our monument being a lantern. The lantern had symbols cut into it that were projected onto the walls when the light was on and each of these shapes are connected to the passenger’s experience on the Komagata Maru. One side of the lantern showed their perspective on what they hoped they would experience when they came to Canada. The other side of the lantern represented the reality of what they faced when they actually arrived on the coast of Canada. Here are several of the symbols used to represent the perspectives of the passengers and our understanding today:

  • House: to represent a home/life they wanted to build in Canada
  • Flowers: to show growth and a life that can blossom in Canada
  • Peace Sign: many of the passengers were coming from severe hardships in India and were looking for a peaceful life.
  • Maple Leaf: this Canadian symbol represented their hope to be Canadian and because they were British Citizens, they thought this was possible.
  • Uneven Scales of Justice: to symbolize the inequality they faced by the Canadian Government, media, and civilians.
  • Thorns: to show the hardships and barriers that were put in place making it impossible to stay.
  • Gun: this symbol demonstrated the violence they experienced in Canada and the violence many faced when they returned to India.
  • Handcuffs: this symbol showed how the passengers were imprisoned on the boat that was supposed bring them to freedom.
  • Broken Heart: to represent their disappointment and their destroyed hopes as they starved and were turned away.

The main challenge in making our visual was finding the best light source for inside our lantern. This was the part that I thought would be easy but the type of light mattered. Some were not strong enough which meant that the shapes were not projected clearly, and some duplicated the shapes so that they overlapped. In the end, we used the light on an iPhone to cast the perfect light.

Exhibition

Our monuments were not only meant to be displayed publicly on our blogs, but were built to show at our 2022 Winter Exhibition. The theme of the exhibition was around the blockbuster movie Avatar and more specifically what the fantasy world of Pandora revealed about our own society. 

There were about eight rooms and each room connected to a theme shown in Avatar that we also see in world history and even in our present. For example, my room theme was militarism and my group and I had to connect the idea of militarism to the Komagata Maru incident. How the Canadian government responded with militarism to the arrival of the Komagata Maru was represented visually in our exhibition room, the Combat Zone. On the night of the exhibition, all of the grades in my room were told to start setting up, as the Grade 9 had a layout and plan in mind. Unfortunately, the student who had created and posted the layout was sick and no one understood what he had drawn. We came up with several ideas and moved props around when we were told that we were in the wrong place. After relocating, we found we were missing two of the tarps needed for the plan. Another challenge was finding the right spot for our specific monument. We needed less light  in order to display our lantern but with the move, our projections were not as effective as we had seen in our trials. We solved this problem with the help of the Grade 12 assigned to our Combat Zone. These were frustrating challenges that required some quick problem solving in the moment. 

In the exhibition, I enjoyed seeing what the other Grade 10 PLP class did for their monuments. I also intentionally went and asked the Grade 8’s and 9’s about their projects. On a personal note, I stood up and answered questions about my project. Instead of letting the others talk, I participated with more confidence and I think it is because my group mates were two very good friends. In the end, the exhibition ended smoothly, we cleaned up quickly, and got excited to see Avatar, The Way of Water.

Top 10 Moments of The Way of Water

  1. Hanging out with friends! 
  2. Popcorn with butter and a sprite!
  3. The small details in the movie ( like the ripples in the water) were fantastic.
  4. The fact that the underwater scenes were filmed underwater and looked authentic!
  5. The Bioluminescence! 
  6. Seeing the change in culture between the Tree People to the Sea People!
  7. Kiri developed cool things as a character.
  8. I loved the bond between the Toruk and Na’vi people.
  9. I like that there will be more in the series.
  10. I was emotionally attached to the youngest child of Jake Sully and Neytiri (Tuktirey) and if she had DIED I would have walked out.

MPOL

There are two driving questions I would like to answer in my MPOL today.

First of all: How have I demonstrated growth as a learner so far this year?

Secondly: How can I sharpen my learning plan to ensure that I reach my learning targets by the end of this school year?

I  showed growth in my communication core competency specifically the communicating aspect of it. I showed this a lot in the working with words poems project where I had to clearly communicate my worldview through poems focusing on a certain literary device. In my Working with Words project, I showed more of my personality and who I am. This is growth for me when I consider feedback from last year and my work on earlier projects which were less personal.

The poem I would like to highlight is the “My Buffoonery”poem. This was an extended metaphor which was new learning for me. I compared my 9 male cousins to orangutans and yet the end of the poem shows how much I care about them.  Another communicating success in this project was the fact that I chose to do an iMovie trailer to introduce myself and the project. I was able to show photos in a fun upbeat way and to give the audience a feel for what my poems would be about. 

Another growth in my communication competency, was in my last scimatics project with showing the different type of bonds though a keynote animation. Using the app to animate in Keynote was challenging but I grew in my knowledge about Keynote animations so I could clearly tell the story about the scientific concept. On the other side of the communication core competency is the collaborating part. I showed this skill with the revolutions on trial by gathering evidence and writing a script with my group. Last year I would not have voiced my ideas as much but this year the Nation X project helped me voice my ideas in order to made a functional society right away. I believe this made it more comfortable for me with my Trial project. I got a good idea about what a functional society wasn’t and that helped me have ideas about what I wanted to say for the Trial. 

The trial project is also a good example of my growth in critical and reflective thinking. Our group didn’t make a strong argument at first and so we revised it multiple times. We even discussed our ideas after school and during lunch with the other team so that we could improve our whole trial. 

In my scimatics project about exponent laws I showed the creative thinking part of the thinking core competency.  I built on my partners’ ideas to make a board game that creatively and correctly showed most of the exponent laws. I enjoyed creating the Exponent Apocalypse. 

The second driving question: How can I sharpen my learning plan to ensure that I reach my learning targets by the end of this school year?

I set profile three for where I want to be for communicating competencies by the end of the year. But reflecting on the Nation X, Working with Words,  the mock trial and the Keynote animation, I think I need to sharpen my learning plan and work towards profile 5. I believe I have achieved profile there and am profile four. One of the challenges I face is confidently communicating with my teachers and communicating more of my personality. I haven’t established a weekly check with the teachers yet which i had written in my learning plan so I will be trying to do that in the next part of the year.

For personal/social competencies, I am working towards profile four where I can recognize my strengths and take responsibility for using strategies to focus, manage stress, and accomplish my goals. I use the THINGS app and my timer and go to LAC in order to focus and manage my time and goals. To manage my stress I exercise, and go to bed on time as much as a night owl can. If school was later in the day like 8 pm my stress level would go down. That is just a suggestion. The main challenge to this area is my anxiety which completely blocks my thinking and strategizing.  

I definitely need to work on being more patient with myself and be more confident with my work I need to be more patient knowing that I might not get it on the first try and that is ok because failing is fine. I don’t make every lay up in basketball or every serve in volleyball and I don’t make that big of a deal of it. I need to think of my learning in that mindset.

 I do go to LAC every morning but I do need to get better at asking for help in class.  I try my best focus on my assignments but I’ve been realizing in my past few projects that I lose focus a lot I need to take more breaks especially in scimatics were we work on the same thing for over an hour I need to get up take a break walk around. 

Overall I feel proud of my growth this half of the year and know that I can make adjustments to my strategies to accomplish my goals before June. 

Working with Words

How might I construct text that shows who I am right now? 

Working with words is the project that will show how.

Poetry? Nine poems? Two and half weeks? Stress levels were high.

Similes, personification, assonance? I feel like I’m going to cry.

Through each poem  I showed a little more of my worldview,

Geography, knowledge, time, society, and a few others too.

Family, friends, experiences that make me who I am,

Chocolate, boating, skiing, and crazy cousins.

Beliefs, dogs, moving, and a global pandemic 

Everyone cautious and wary, its become epidemic!

Starting the poems caused a lot of stress,

Writing the meaning statements made me depressed.

But the complimentary texts and About Me Video pulled me through,

To help me show who I am to you.

Working with words is the project that will show you how

I might construct text that shows who I am right now.

Summative blog Post  People and the Environment 

This humanities project’s topic question was “How do people and the environment affect each other.” We had to write a letter about an environmental issue in bc saying what the problem was, showing some evidence, and finding a solution. We would then be sending the letter to someone who could make a change on the issue. 

An important part of this unit was our common lit reading and writing assignments. We read about environmental issues and how they affected people and how people affect the environment. Sometimes the environmental issue was presented through a story or article and one time through a poem called “Turtle’s Song”.  We had to read the writing and answer the questions as well as complete writing responses. I found the “He-y, Come on O-it” the most interesting story even though it was fiction, it showed the idea that people need to be aware of what happens to waste. It doesn’t just go away. Short term solutions aren’t the answer.  For the Common Lit Milestones, I learned a lot about how to write about environmental issues and connecting ideas in between stories. The picture I included shows evidence of my learning as well as shows the curricular competency: I can analyze how texts use literary devices to enhance both meaning and impact.

Another way we were answering the driving question was through the letter which was the product of the whole project. I chose to write my letter about microfibres in our waterways and how they get there through an everyday activity, doing laundry. In hopes of making a difference I chose to write a letter to the Minister of the Environment in BC. His name was Honorable George Heyman. I wrote many drafts of the letter that was critqued by many different audiences. One grade 12 student told me to make my letter more concise. This comment made me shorten my letter and get to my point more quickly. My drafts including my final letter are below. The letter and every step I did to make the letter showed two curricular competencies:

  • I can use writing and design process to plan, develop, and create original, and engaging and meaningful texts for a variety of purposes and audiences. 
  • I can reflect, assess and refine texts to improve clarity, effectiveness, and impact for purpose,   audience and message.

Drafts of letter

Final letter draft

 

Something I found very amusing was the fact that almost NOBODY in our
class knew how to write the address and return address on the letter. The teachers had to take extra time to show us how to do this and give us extra
time to do it! Because we normally don’t use pencils (especially mini ones) it was hard to get the lettering straight and neat. I’ve never personally had to address a letter before. It shows how difference between my generation and ones before. 

 

 

Another evidence of my learning all three of these curricular competencies is the common lit connections multi paragraph assignment. We had to tie the common lit readings to our letter in three paragraphs. The most challenging part for me was understanding what was being asked of me to write. Even after I asked my friends I didn’t understand what I had to write. I understood all the stories and the letter but didn’t understand what I actually had to write. After completing the outline and making a theme statement it was more clear what I had to do. The photo below is the common lit connections that I did with Mr. Harris’ critique on how to improve.

I enjoyed learning about the environmental issues in more depth than I have done in the past. This was a very open ended project where we had to research and find an environmental issue here in BC and find a solution. At the beginning of the project I didn’t think we could come up with solutions but everyone in the class had a great idea of how to solve their issue. By researching how doing laundry affects the ocean so much, I realized that everything we do affects the environment.  Even though I think that there are more destroyers than protectors in our world right now, there are lot of people who are making a change in the 21st century. Everything you do affects the environment. When the environment is affected, we are affected too. SO BUY A MICROFILTER!!