This Post Sucks! No It Doesn’t!

Public speaking is a weakness for some people and a strength for others. When it comes to myself, I can’t decide if it is either. I’m not afraid of getting up in front of people and giving my opinion, but that can almost be a weakness when I’m not carefully thinking about what I say before it comes out of my mouth. Although, with this specific assignment, that was probably a good thing, because you probably didn’t have to time to think before you spoke anyways.

The way this project was presented made it nearly impossible to prepare like you would for a normal debate. We didn’t know our questions beforehand, and we had to think up all our examples and answers on the spot. Oh, and who won was pretty subjective. It was based on judges who didn’t truly understand the assignment and an audience who just voted for their own kids.

When it comes down to it, these were not debates. They were informal arguments. I’m pretty sure the point of the assignment was to assess our public speaking, and not our debate skills, so the actual project seemed to suffer. Anybody who had any fear of public speaking would not go up and say anything because they didn’t have much time to go off of. It is because of this reason that my group’s first and only debate ended up just being a screaming match between me and Matthew Seed.

I still believe that my team should have won because my arguments were better than his, and he contradicted himself at least three times. However, he took advantage of the audience vote by delivering zingers instead of actual points. This won him the argument because I got caught in a loop of trying to derail all his random points while he just threw out more.

The same issue occurred in the second debate we did. In the “losers” debate, my team again lost because we got attacked by zingers and those debates were decided only by audience vote. What I can say is that the team that won the whole thing did win by actually debating correctly.

My point isn’t that I’m mad that I lost because we didn’t deserve to win those debates in those formats. Although, they were not debates, and I’m pretty aware that being debates was not the point of them. It was for an exhibition, therefore it was designed to be entertaining. However, if the teachers were to do this same assignment again, I would hope they would take these concerns into account. I don’t like the idea of teaching these as debates because they are not. They are not debates in the same way that the 2016 presidential election didn’t hold a single debate.

Although we see it all the time in our class, and on YouTube, and in politics, I am appalled at the fact that anyone would be taught that a roast counts as an intellectual debate. If you want to teach public speaking, teach public speaking, but do not use it to create a world where we are brought up to believe that anything like that should be okay in a formal setting. If we decide we believe in that, we have truly lost our democracy.

Is Innocence Beneficial or Detrimental to Society?

In 1937, Walt Disney released the first fully animated feature film in history. What was seen as a massive risk paid off, with Snow White and The Seven Dwarves being such a success that 80 years later, the film still holds a 98% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The film was revered by audiences and critics alike, as it was thought to capture a beautiful childlike innocence that was previously considered too silly for a full motion picture. A critic by the name of John C. Flinn Sr. would write “So perfect is the illusion [of the film], so tender the romance and fantasy,” predicting the success of Seven Dwarves and the entire career of Walt Disney. The entire world was in love with Walt Disney’s smart yet wonderful world, until suddenly, not everybody was.

The same people who were calling praising Disney’s work would turn against him in the years to follow. The praise of Seven Dwarves and Fantasia would slowly turn into bitter remarks of how Disney had lost his magic, murdering the classics like Peter Pan with his all too innocent take on them.  While the masses were still flocking to Walt Disney Pictures, critics and “intellectuals” began to criticize Disney’s films. They would begin to believe that “Walt Disney had the innate bad taste of the American public”. This criticism of Disney’s films would continue from the 1940’s all the way until the 1990’s, with some critics still believing that Disney is entirely too innocent.

But what does that mean? Does innocence really harm out society as much as the critics like to think it does? I asked some of my friends what they thought about Disney movies being too innocent,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwrHO6lW51g&t=0s

although I figured that I should probably look beyond the people I sit lunch with.

In, Lord of The Flies, a novel that my class read this term, (and you probably read in high school, too), there is a very signifigant quote near the end of the book on this topic. The quote states that “Ralph wept for the end of innocence”. To me, this quote means that innocence is something that benefits society. Although I could directly say that if Ralph was still innocent, he would not be crying, there is more than that to the quote. This quote proves that humanity relies on innocence to be reminded of the good in the world.

This exact concept is also explored in the Shakespeare play Macbeth. Macbeth, at the beginning of the play, is a medieval lord version of innocent.  Although the man was a war hero, meaning he sliced off the heads of a lot of people, he was doing so out of what he believed was a true belief in the good. At this point, Macbeth was innocent to the corruption and thoughts of power that would overtake him once he was exposed to them. Once evil ideas were put into his head by the 3 Witches and his wife Lady Macbeth, he loses himself and becomes a completely different person, showing once again that without innocence, goodness is lost.

We can mirror this concept a third time in the novel Three Day Road. Before heading off to war,  both Xavier and Elijah are innocent to the horrors of war. Being exposed to these horrors is what turns Elijah into a ruthless and insane killer, while Xavier, who removes himself from the other men as much as possible, stays somewhat innocent and therefore does not go crazy like his friend.

All of these examples point to one thing: Innocence is beneficial. Perhaps not on a global, political, or community scale. However, innocence is important when it comes to personal well-being. Without innocence, we become shells of who we once were, as we are exposed to evils and lose the faith and hope we once had. This is why it is important for there to be innocent movies for our children, so that they may grow up believing there is good in the world. Without that belief, it is likely that nobody would strive towards goodness, and humanity would have been gone a long time ago.

Fear and Events

Radiation is something that the general public doesn’t know what to think. When I asked my friends what effect the word “radiation” had on them, most of them said no effect, with one person saying it makes him happy (I think he was just trying to screw with my data pool though). Then I asked about the word “nuclear” and they said it made them feel a lot more uncomfortable than radiation. Then, I tried to ask more questions and nobody replied, obviously done with my obnoxious mind games.

The only thing I can draw from this is that it’s likely that 16-year-olds in Deep Cove are more afraid of nuclear stuff than radiation. That’s something I probably could have guessed but it’s nice to have some not-so-scientific data to go along with it. This probably has a lot to do with the world we live in and how we’ve been brought up and where we’ve been brought up. If you asked a 16-year-old in Japan what they thought about those words, would they have a different answer? Would they have been shaped positively by how nuclear power has powered their country, or more shaped by the nuclear disasters that have affected their childhoods?

According to a study done by Yale University, male students that live near the nuclear fallout areas in Japan still have a high confidence in nuclear power and believe in the efficiency of the power source. This is compared to female students of the same areas, who fear nuclear power more than their male counterparts. The girls say they’re worried about the environment in the cases of nuclear fallout, which is something that does not worry the boys.

The same study also states that there is a public fear about cleanup, and moving the contaminated soil and materials. They public is worried about crop contamination, which is a very close to home issue for a lot of Japanese people. This shows that people most fear what will affect them directly.

Since the Fukushima disaster, the entire world has become timider towards the idea of nuclear power, with countries like Germany even saying they plan to phase out their nuclear programs. This attitude, however, has been around for a very long time. In The China Syndrome, which takes place before both the Church Rock and Chernobyl incidents. people were already uneasy towards the idea of nuclear power. The public in the movie already wants the power plants turned off, even though there was only one record of a nuclear reactor having any sort of accident at the time.

I believe that this proves that our fear is controlled by events, and exposure. The more fear we are exposed to, the more fear we have. This is explained by attitudes of the Japanese people and the global public towards the Fukushima incident.

The Scottish Play

I may have put this post off a little bit.

I made a post at the end of my own Macbeth video experience. I wrote that post right before I left for New York City for my music trip. At that point, even the thought of the project was stressful, so I was happy I was leaving, but I did not want to think about how the whole situation was going to turn out. So much so, that I made Spencer, Luc, and Stan all promise not to speak of the project the entire time we were in New York. Luckily, we accomplished that goal.

Because we were in New York, I have still not seen the Macbeth video. I know it’s mostly done???

All I know is it hasn’t been posted, I haven’t seen it, and I want my SD card back.

Sorry about this post, I’ll fix it when I see the video.

Here’s My Canada: My Story

I had a completely different plan for this video. Although, there is a problem with my brain. If I have a vision in my head, and I cannot make that vision come to life…well, then I can’t use that idea at all without thinking it’s absolutely terrible. So after an hour of filming and realizing that idea is never going to work, I had to think of something else. Fast.

The first thing I did was try to get inspiration from my footage roll. I figured I must have some video of Canda somewhere, so I dug out my hard-drive.

As it turns out, I have footage of every place I’ve ever been that’s not in Canada. I have Disneyland, Disneyworld, Seattle, NYC, Honduras, Oregon, The South. I even have Alaska! But I literally never film anything in Canada, because I don’t feel the need to remember anything here, because why would I?

Then I remembered that I actually do film my life, and so does nearly every single person I know. All the best bits of my day-to-day life are saved right in my Snapchat memories folder. So I went looking through my Snapchat memories to find the best things I could that would represent my life. It was simultaneously easier and harder than I thought. I put all the stuff I thought was good into iMovie, except I then learned I had picked over 5 minutes of footage for a 30 second video. To fix this, I first axed everything that was only funny because of the audio, or said anything even slightly bad in it (there wasn’t a lot of that, because my life isn’t very exciting). Then I just had to cut down and rearrange the video until it made sense.

But then I really wanted it to feel like you were watching my Snapchat story, so I wanted to do a screencap of my phone. I didn’t know how to do this and I panicked for a second when I look it up and it said that I would have to jailbreak my phone. But then, I realized all that I had to do was plug my phone into my computer and use Quicktime. So that was a LOT easier than I thought it was going to be. The other thing I had to do was put my name and “2m ago” in the corner of the video, which was easy cause all I did was download some video making app called Vont and use that.

Originally, I wanted to put voice over over top of my video, but I decided that wouldn’t make as much sense with this kind of video, as I felt it kind of spoke for itself. So instead, I decided to find some creative commons music and put that over top. I think I found some that more or less expressed the mood I was going for.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTcZnTEt1qo

I don’t really think this video will win, because whoever is judging this might not like it very much.

Then again, even our Prime Minister uses Snapchat.

Although I honestly really don’t care if it wins, because I like it a lot and think it really expresses what My Canada is.

UPDATE: Here’s my video on the site!! Go vote for me!

http://www.heresmycanada.ca/videos/heres-my-canada-my-story-2/

The Concept of Intuiton

Surviving a war can be based on a number of things. Strength, luck, and circumstance can be major factors in living through rough times. Over that, there is one thing that helps us all yet is hard to explain. Human intuition determines nearly everything we do, even if only indirectly. We sometimes aren’t able to recognize this in our lives, because of the way it is viewed in our society. We are taught to not trust our instincts and use logic instead, although there are times when instinct is all you have.

When WWII veteran Helmut came to our class to tell his story,  he talked about a few things that related to the power of intuition. Everything from turning right instead of left, and staying still instead of running boils down to our instincts, because they are our immediate response. There is even a mixture of instinctive thinking and deliberate thinking. Because of Helmut’s intuitive thinking that his mother needed him, he made the decision to go find his mother. This instinct to return home changed the course of his own life and his mother’s life forever, as when Helmut made it home, his mother was quite sick. She truly did need her son in that time, and

Human instinct is based on recognition of patterns, which is something that is often picked up by our unconscious mind and body before it appears in our conscious thoughts.

OUR ULTIMATE BRO, THE NETHERLANDS

I literally had no idea that Canada was friends with the Netherlands. It turns out, though, we are. And for pretty good reason. They helped us out quite a bit during WWII, with housing their royal family and liberating them from German rule in 1945. Due to that, we have developed a very good relationship with the Dutch. It’s easy to see why we have a such a good relationship with each other due to just that information alone. We even have a special work visa program for youth in both countries.

Because of all of this, I was curious about how exactly we helped out the country before and after we freed them from the Germans. The actual steps I found that were necessary for rehabilitating a country were lengthy and detailed.

First of all, we had to fight.

It’s no secret that over 7,000 Canadian lives were lost while liberating the Netherlands. Though many of the stories told of the Canadians coming in with big tanks, rolling into towns and saving them, that’s just the happy part of the story. There were thousands of lives lost before we could get to that point. A good example of this kind of fighting would be The Battle of the Scheldt. This was a task that was left mainly to the Canadians to accomplish, and we fought whole-heartedly for five weeks to chase the Germans away. In this battle, we lost over 12 thousand allied men, with over half of those men being Canadian soldiers. This battle, and other smaller ones like it, were incredibly important on the road to rehabilitating The Netherlands.

Although we didn’t go straight from those rough battles to heading in and freeing the people. After we won battles, we had to hold the land. It was months before we could say that the Germans weren’t just going to turn around and start fighting to get back into the area. We had to show that we weren’t going to forget how dangerous this was was just because we were starting to win, we kept our ground, cautious as ever. This was extremely important in ensuring the safety of ourselves and the civilians of those areas.

As soon as we decided to take action, the rest of it went by very quickly. We moved forward as quickly as possible and secured Northeastern Europe. As soon as we had done that, we had the land, and we were on our way to liberating the people and driving the Germans out.

This is when we finally began driving into towns and taking over. Although, this didn’t happen all at once. It was slow, it was steady, and it was still tough. But we were doing it, and that was what was making all the difference. This article has videos of Canadian Soldiers sharing their experiences with coming into the Netherlands. For years afterward, we would work with the Netherlands to help rebuild their communities, and they would honour us by burying our soldiers on their land and caring for their graves. To this day, the military graveyards are kept. This is a respect that could not be described in any other way than their actions.

It takes a lot to fight in a war, and even more to win one. Luckily, these countries that were directly affected had countries that were not come and help them, on the basis of human decency. These acts of kindness make the world go round and build mutual respect in countries that might otherwise not have a lot in common.

And to that, I saulte…uh..us all?

 

A High School Sargent

Throughout my entire childhood, I have been reminded of World War II. When you’re a child, you tend to think that these wars happened a lot longer ago than they did. In my mind, World War II has always been a lifetime ago. The soldiers that died in that war didn’t have any weight in my mind until recently. I was, for the longest time, under the impression that war no longer existed anywhere near my life. I didn’t realize that soldiers death’s affected me at all. I understood the weight of the holocaust long before I understood the weight of our own soldiers. I never thought about how in the time of wars past, putting your life on the line was often something that was expected of you, not a personal choice. War affects me, and it affects all of us. Every single soldier’s life or death shapes our country, and it shapes our world. I never thought about it. I think about it now as we enter a state of unrest, all across the globe. It’s easy to think  you are safe, and you are in a bubble that cannot be touched. Now, we are all forced to think about the realities of war, and how it was possible and real. And people before us bravely experienced it. I am aware that at least two of my great-grandfathers were in the second world war. If one of them were to have died in combat instead of the thousands of men and women who did, I could have never been born. I am affected by every soldier, and so is every single one of us. With that being said, I want to recognize that the soldier I cover in this post, I hold to the upmost respect. I do not mean to put words in the mouth of a soldier, but use this assignment as educational experience where I do my best to understand life in those times.

With that out of the way, I am going to tell you about Norman Andrews Ash.

Norman was born in Edmonton, Alberta on June 2nd, 1922. At the time of his enlistment, he was 18 years old and living in Peace River, Alberta. He had two younger brothers, and one older sister. He had just graduated from high school. He was an athlete, doing exceptionally well in hockey and skiing, but had tried nearly every sport under the sun. He was a leader at his local church. Norman was highly regarded by the figures of authority in his life, saying he had “initiative and an unusual ability in leadership”. He got good grades in school, and enjoyed photography. He also loved model airplanes, which is perhaps what got him interested in becoming a pilot in the war.

In the forces, he was well liked by his peers. Norman was said to be “very popular with everyone on the squadron”. Although some reports called him “slightly irresponsible”, his superiors seemed to like him as well. I’d like to think that was linked to how young he was. By the time he would die in a night flying practicing incident in England, he was 20 years old. In his personal affects sent back home, included was a camera, photo album, and book of poems. He was said to be confident, likeable, and from what I can see pretty well-rounded.

I’ve tried my best to bring Norman to light in the fake letter I have written to his family from him. This is Norman Ash, from my perspective.

Dear Father,

Thank you for your last letter. It’s good to know that everyone is doing well. I wish I could be home to see Sidney Jr. graduate from school. I am so happy to hear that he is going off the university. I am sure whatever he decides to do, he will do it well. He has always been smarter than I am, even though I am two years older than him.

Learning to fly is just as exciting as I thought it would be. I always imagined flying an airplane, and here I am, really doing it! I feel like a bird up in the air, like nobody can stop me. I must admit that I am but an average pilot, though I am doing quite well. My superiors seem to like me, and are surprisingly patient when I make a mistake. Which isn’t very often, don’t worry about that.

I am getting along well with my entire squadron. Everyone seem stop like me here. I wasn’t sure if anyone was going to take me seriously, though there are lots of guys my age out here. I was especially worried about the older men, but they seem to all respect us for enlisting in the first place. I didn’t expect things to go so well for me, but I feel confident and at ease. I’m sure if I keep that demeanour I will come back home without a scratch.

In this letter, I am enclosed one of the photographs I have taken with my bullet camera of some men doing repair work on some planes. Please give everyone my regards.

Your son,

Norman

 

RUM, FORREST, RUM!!

This week we finally started to go over whatever happened after WWI finally ended. The 1920’s were defined by a few things, but most of them were sad and not very interesting, so I’m just going to ignore most of it and be happy that I wasn’t alive in that pathetic time period (I can say this because nobody who remembers the 1920s knows how to use a computer).

Canada sucked pretty badly back then. In the whole lesson, I only found one interesting thing about us. We profited from American prohibition in a YUGE way.

Two years ago, in the summer of 2015, I went to Washington DC. When I went to the National Museum of Archives, there was an entire exhibit about prohibition. I spent a lot of time in that exhibit because I found it pretty interesting. However, I don’t remember it ever mentioning Canada’s part in their prohibition. So when I found out how big a part Canada had in America having alcohol in the 1920s and 30s, I was pretty impressed with us. I was also slightly annoyed that America tends to erase our history, but I don’t have time to be pissed off about that right now.

The point is, Canadians had a huge part in helping our Yankee neighbors attain alcohol when it was illegal in the United States. This was called “rum-running“, and it was pretty much exactly what it sounds like. They ran….booze. Across the border. It was one of the only good ways to make money after the stock market crashed in 1929, although people still did it much earlier than that. The biggest output for this was in Windsor, Ontario. It’s the southmost city in Canada and had actually been smuggling alcohol into the US since 1916, as that’s when it’s neighbours in Michigan got their booze taken away. They invented a culture of smuggling that would be followed across Canada as more and more places started to band alcohol.

When you ban things, people get better at hiding them. The black market for booze was complex, and had its own set of rules. If someone came into a speakeasy declaring “Joe sent them”, that meant they brought you the goods. Quietly, they would unload a truck full of liquid into your building, you would pay them the money, and everyone would be on their merry way.

Okay- maybe it wasn’t that simple. But that was essentially how it would go. It most likely wasn’t nearly as monitored as we would have thought. If you think about it, it may be even less monitored than marijuana has been nowadays (or, up until very recently). It can be hard to get even a little bit of drugs across the borders, and in the 1920s and 30s, hundreds of people were bringing truckloads of illegal alcohol across the borders, and most people didn’t get caught. You can boil that down to lack of technology or stupidity as they didn’t check people at the border as much back then, but it also shows that prohibition was only a huge deal because a majority of the population drank alcohol. The people fighting against it were in the minority, and they still are, which is why we laugh at posters like these:

But take very seriously posters like these (again, lesser in the past few years):

There may have been less problems rum-running because there weren’t too many people opposing it. Chances are, the guy running the post at the border would head to the speakeasy as soon as his shift was over. If the American people looked the other way, and the Canadian government looked the other way, it made for a very easy arrangement on both sides. That’s how this whole situation would be able to work. It’s something that we could never accomplish today because of screens and everything, but without the screens, it’s pretty easy to get past the big guy when you’re all on the same side.

Anyways, while I was busy researching this, I found out something even more interesting. Well, to me. Eh, maybe to other people as well, we’ll see.

I found out that my great-grandfather WAS rum-runner! He was also a cowboy, professional hockey player, fought in WWI, and built a ferry or something. I think when I was talking to my grandfather about this he also mentioned something about an ice-cream truck, but I honestly cannot be certain.

Speaking of, I did phone my grandfather after my mom told me about this, and he gave me some information on what he knows about what his dad did.

This all happened before my grandfather was born. From approx. 1931 to 1933, my great-grandfather Bill McKinley had a job as a truck driver, and part of what he did was run alcohol down to the United States from Alberta. He took a lot of other stuff places as well, but the rum running was very much there. He did this during the off-season of hockey, which he played professionally for a team located in Edmonton. However, the pay wasn’t very good. Luckily, one of the deals of being on the hockey team was that they arranged jobs for players during the off-season. Although my grandfather can’t know for sure, he’s pretty convinced that this truck driver job was what was arranged for his father. He did it for so long wearing long boot up to his knees that he actually stopped growing hair under his knees. That’s the story, anyways.

My grandfather isn’t sure whether or not his dad took the booze all the way down to the speakeasies or just passed them off to someone else for that part. In fact, my grandfather didn’t have a lot of information past the fact that he did this job and that he was a “badass”.

Though my mom did have some pictures of him.

Here’s Bill McKinley when he was in uniform for when he was in the military. This would be around 1940 I’m guessing? I’m pretty sure he was in the Air Force due to the wings.

Also, his eyes creep me out.

Here he is as an older man, carrying my mom on his shoulders. This would be around 1973. He died in 1986. I think he was about 70-something when he passed away.

Here he is with my grandfather, Martin McKinley, at the ocean or a lake or something. This would be approx. 1940. I also can’t help but notice the cigarette in his mouth, and I am happy that it is no longer socially acceptable to smoke near your child’s head.

I’m pretty certain this is my grandfather with my newborn mother. If that is the case, this would be in October 1971.

Here he is again with his wife, Norma McKinley. They were together their whole lives. Of course, you couldn’t really divorce people easily until the 1970s that’s no suprise.

The RAWRIN’ XD Twenties

On December 14th,  our class transformed the gym into 5 different time periods, and it actually went….well?

I still can’t believe we managed to pull this off. None of us even really started THINKING about it until 10 days before the date. I 100% expected us to bomb hard, but somehow, every single group pulled it together (then again, usually at least most of us pull it together). Although, that doesn’t mean it went perfectly. At least twice I forgot one of my lines and just shouted “NO!” in its place. That’s okay though, it worked.

The groups were split like this:

  1. Pre-WWI Canada
  2. The Trenches (1916)
  3. Conscription Crisis (1917)
  4. Post-WWI Canada (1920’s)
  5. The Depression (1930’s)

I was part of the 1920’s group, along with Chloe, Maria, Luciano, and Michael S. At first, we figured that there was a clear path cut out for us. The 20’s were great! There was no war, and people listened to jazz, and started watching movies, and uhh… flappers? Are flappers softcore strippers?

We knew nothing about the 1920’s. We didn’t actually get taught about the 20’s and 30’s  like we were the war and pre-war time stuff. We’re actually finally going over the 20’s and 30’s now (Woohoo for having a headstart!). So pretty much, the first thing we had to do was spend a few days arguing over what the most important parts of the 1920’s were. We eventually settled on (white) women earning the right to vote, racism (just like, in general), workers rights/unions, and the economy beginning to suck. This way, we were able to lay out our path and write our script pretty easily.

We would start in a voting station (ironically enough we were already in a modern voting station: a public school gym) for the 1921 election, and a white woman (Chloe) would be there and talk to people about women voting and the stance of the country. People would vote. Then an aboriginal soldier (Maria) would try and vote and a powerful white dude (Michael) would throw her out. She would bring people out to the “street” where I would rally everyone together and they would join my worker’s strike. Michael would show up again and break up the strike. Finally, a busker with a sax (Luciano) would talk to the people about how bad things are getting. That leads us right into the depression.

Although, by the time we had the script done, we had like 2 days left to pull it all together.

Luckily we seemed to be the group that needed the least actual props. We were able to get the school voting stations and box that we use for our school-wide fake elections we have whenever there’s a real election. We put up a divider, some signs about the parties, a potted plant, BAM we’re done.

It was all good until we realized our outside wasn’t going to really look like outside at all. We actually ended up dumping dirt on the floor to fix this problem in the end, but before the day of the exhibition, we created a backdrop that had houses and trees and a sky and stuff to show that we were in fact, outside. The houses even had cute little signs out front supporting the candidates for the election!! Just like nowadays!! Except back then neither of the candidates was a moldy orange!

Sorry. I shouldn’t be talking about our downstairs neighbours right now.

When we were working on it in the hall, people walking by kept on asking if it was for Santa’s Breakfast, which I don’t get. Unless the elves were really supportive of William Lyon Mackenzie King.

Anyways, the day of we basically just had to put everything together and then memorize our scripts (luckily not too hard). I think we managed to pull it off pretty well.

Except the gym was freezing cold and I lost my voice from shouting all night. I got super sick the day after. I. Am. Still. Sick. 24 DAYS LATER!!!!!

So, on a personal level, this exhibition was not a success.

Here’s some photo’s from my part of the exhibition, and below you can watch our 4-minute presentation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueWKBtdHXR0&feature=youtu.be