(Insert Awesome Book Review Here)

Hello, Internet.

So we’ve been studying World War II in Socials, and as a part of that we’ve been reading books related to it. I read All The Light We Cannot See, a novel by Anothony Doerr. It’s a book I’d heard of before– it’s Doerr’s best known work, and judging by the amount of critical acclaim it has received, quite possibly also his best.

Anthony Doerr

Here is my review:

Anthony Doerr’s novel All the Light We Cannot See tells the story of two characters living through World War II: a blind French girl who has to leave her hometown of Paris for the first time to live with her great uncle, and a young German boy in the process of becoming a soldier. The book tells their stories over a span of several years, and we see the characters both coming of age in their own ways. Both protagonists are compelling, sympathetic, strong characters with unique perspectives on the war.

The girl, Marie-Laure LeBlanc, is living in Paris with her father when the war begins. The book takes great pains to describe the life the two shared in the years before the war, describing everything from the model town Marie-Laure’s father made her so she could learn where things were while blind to the birthday gifts she got every year to the coffee they routinely drink in the morning. The two flee to the town of Saint-Malo to stay with Étienne, Marie-Laure’s great uncle. In their possession is a small stone called the Sea of Flames, a diamond which legend says is cursed so that the owner will live forever but misfortune will come to all their loved ones.

The boy, Werner Pfennig, is living in an orphanage with his sister Jutta prior to the war. He has an affinity for radios, having fixed up an old radio he and Jutta discovered in order to listen to broadcasts, and acting as a radio repairman for the people in the town in which he lives. Once the war begins, he becomes a cadet. The book follows his experiences training to be in the army, and the harshness of the training program that he is forced to go through. Eventually, he becomes a fully fledged soldier, and goes to fight in the war.

While both plots and characters are interesting and engaging, the book itself proves to be confusing due to how quickly it switches back and forth between the main characters’ perspectives. Additionally, it will often jump back and forth between years, making it difficult to tell what order events are happening in, as well as where and when a certain scene is taking place. Often only a few pages are spent with a character before the book suddenly switches perspectives and plot lines completely.

Regardless, once you figure out where and when the scene you’re reading about is happening, the book is enjoyable, if saddening. It draws you in with descriptions of life for both characters, especially of life for the blind Marie-Laure. The book describes her experiences becoming blind, saying the world has now become “a labyrinth bristling with hazards”, where “cars growl in the streets, leaves whisper in the sky” and “blood rustles through her inner ears”. The book allows a look into not only the realities of living during a war, but also how it can have an irreversible effect on the rest of people’s lives. All in all, once you get past the initial confusion of the style in which the book is written, it is a strong story with interesting protagonists, and definitely worth a read.

Toodles!

(Insert Improvised Blog Post Here)

Hello, Internet.

So you might remember that a while back we hosted the regional Destination Imagination tournament, in which I took part in the improvisational challenge. Last weekend, it came time for the provincial tournament.

 

In the gap between regionals and provincials, my team decided to give a lot of focus to learning more about our list of explorers, two of which we would have to integrate into our final improv skit. (The gist of the challenge was this: you’re given two explorers and one “cultural treasure” from a list, and you have to make a skit about the explorers recovering the treasure. The whole thing takes place in an unusual setting which you are also given at the start of the skit. Partway through the skit, you are also given a random setback to incorporate. The only prop you are allowed is a single white bedsheet) Not knowing enough about our explorers was an area where we felt that we really fell short in our first performance, so we wanted to make sure we all really knew who our explorers were.

 

Our full list of explorers was as follows:

 

Ann Bancroft , a skier who skied through both the arctic and Antarctic (not to be confused with Anne Bancroft, the actress from The Graduate)

Jacques Cousteau , the coinventor of the aqualung.

Captain Kidd, a Scottish sailor.

Leif Ericson, the Viking who discovered North America.

Howard Carter , the man who found King Tut’s tomb.

Katherine Johnson , a black woman who was a computer for NASA.

John James Audubon , an ornithologist and the author of Birds of America.

Elon Musk , the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla.

Captain Nemo , the protagonist of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea.

Ruth Benedict , an American anthropologist.

Blackbeard (Edward Teach), a famous pirate.

Alice, the protagonist of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There

 

Unfortunately, half my team was unable to be there, so despite having prepared more thouroughly for provincials than regionals, we went into our second tournament with significantly less confidence. This turned out to be reasonable, as we ended up coming in fifth place out of five.

This means that we can’t progress to the next round of DI (Globals), so this is our final round of DI for this year.

Now, DI is a good chance to do a lot of critical thinking, and it can be a good way to develop certain skills. I’ve been regularly participating in DI for a few years now, and I always find it to be a challenge, and something that requires lots of work, thinking and effort on the part of the students participating. We looked at a study showing that students who participated in DI were more engaged, better collaborators, more self confident, and more creative (among other things) than those who didn’t, and DI definitely requires you to use skills in all these areas. However, all the attributes mentioned above seem to me like things that people would already have to possess in order to be interested in DI and successfully complete a challenge, and in our case, they seem like attributes necessary to get into PLP.

 

From my my own experience, I would say a skill that DI helps you (or at least helped me) develop is commitment to and throughout something frustrating or difficult. For instance, the first time I did DI my group struggled to think of ideas for some of the requirements, which were much more specific than we were used to, and we had to work through arguments and a lot of fruitless brainstorming until we eventually worked out an idea.

 

In fact, the whole “requirements being more specific” thing brings me to another skill that DI helped me develop: reading long, important, confusing, and very specific documents and interpreting the information in a useful way. Reading the rules for our first ever challenge felt a bit like trying to actually read the terms and conditions before using an app or other software, but as I already mentioned, it eventually became important to read and understand them– and we did it. We went through and highlighted important things, moved pages into different apps so we could read smaller sections without it being so overwhelming, made notes paraphrasing important information as we went so we could keep track of it, and basically any other techniques we could think of (using our aforementioned creativity and critical thinking), and we developed a skill that we weren necessarily already strong at.

 

To summarize, I think the skills that DI helps you build are somewhat misconstrued; sure, it can help develop the skills and attributes you already have as strengths, but what it does more is force you to pick up whatever new skills happen to be necessary to your challenge (for instance, we all learned improv!) by making you commit even when it gets difficult– and that can be extremely important.

 

Anyway, I won’t make this blog post so long and confusing it feels like reading terms and conditions.

 

 

Toodles.

 

Skip to toolbar